| 247 | 0 | 81 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为探究不同机收方式对再生稻产量和品质的影响,于2023—2024年开展大田试验,以隆晶优1212(高节位再生型品种)和甬优4949(低节位再生型品种)为供试品种,设置常规水稻收割机收获和再生稻专用收割机收获2种机收方式处理,测定头季机收碾压率、头季和再生季产量及产量构成因素与再生季稻米品质等指标。结果表明,相比于常规水稻收割机收获方式,采用再生稻专用收割机收获的,头季机收碾压率从44.3%降至22.7%。在再生稻专用收割机收获方式下,隆晶优1212和甬优4949再生季2 a平均产量分别为3.91、5.26 t/hm2,分别较常规水稻收割机收获方式增产17.4%、10.5%。与常规水稻收割机收获方式相比,头季采用再生稻专用收割机收获的,再生季有效穗数、单位面积颖花数和结实率分别提高10.2%、7.0%和7.1%,而每穗颖花数和千粒重差异不显著。从稻米品质来看,相比于常规水稻收割机收获方式,头季采用再生稻专用收割机收获的,2个品种再生季平均整精米率提高2.4%,平均垩白粒率和垩白度分别降低21.0%、15.2%;在再生稻专用收割机收获方式下,隆晶优1212和甬优4949较常规水稻收割机收获的整精米率分别提高4.1%、1.0%,垩白粒率分别降低19.7%、22.5%,垩白度分别降低19.2%、10.0%。比较碾压行的再生季产量和稻米品质发现,相较于隆晶优1212,甬优4949碾压行的年平均产量提高23.5%,整精米率提高25.2%,垩白粒率和垩白度分别降低12.0%、22.2%。综上,头季采用再生稻专用收割机收获,可显著降低机收碾压率,进而提升再生季产量和稻米品质,对高节位再生型品种的改善效果更佳。
Abstract:To investigate the effects of different mechanical harvesting methods on the yield and grain quality of ratoon rice, a field experiment was conducted from 2023 to 2024 with Longjingyou 1212(a high-node ratoon rice variety) and Yongyou 4949(a low-node ratoon rice variety). Two harvesting methods—the ordinary rice harvester and specialized harvester for ratoon rice—were applied. Key indicators, including the stubble damage rate in the main season, yields and yield components in the main and ratooning season, and grain quality in the ratooning season, were measured. The results showed that compared with the ordinary harvester, the specialized harvester used in the main season reduced the stubble damage rate from 44.3% to 22.7%. Under the specialized harvester treatment, the two-year average yields of Longjingyou 1212 and Yongyou 4949 in the ratooning season were 3.91 t/hm2 and 5.26 t/hm2, representing increases of 17.4% and 10.5%, respectively, compared with those under the ordinary harvester treatment. Further analysis revealed that compared with the ordinary harvester, the specialized harvester used in the main season increased the effective panicles, spikelets per unit area, and grain filling rate by 10.2%, 7.0%, and 7.1%, respectively, while causing no significant difference in spikelets per panicle or 1 000-grain weight in the ratooning season. In terms of grain quality, compared with the ordinary harvester, the specialized harvester used in the main season improved the average head rice rate by 2.4% and reduced the average chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree by 21.0% and 15.2%, respectively, of two varieties in the ratooning season. Compared with the ordinary harvester, the specialized harvester used in the main season increased the head rice rates by 4.1% and 1.0%, decreased the chalky grain rate by 19.7% and 22.5%, and reduced the chalkiness degrees by 19.2% and 10.0% for Longjingyou 1212 and Yongyou 4949 in the ratooning season, respectively. Regarding the track rows, Yongyou 4949 showed an increase of 23.5% in annual average yield, an increase of 25.2% in head rice rate, and reductions of 12.0% and 22.2% in chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree, respectively, compared with Longjingyou 1212 in the ratooning season. In conclusion, using a specialized harvester in the main season significantly reduced the stubble damage rate, thereby enhancing the yield and grain quality in the ratooning season, with more pronounced benefits for high-node ratoon rice varieties.
[1]Peng S B,Zheng C,Yu X. Progress and challenges of rice ratooning technology in China[J]. Crop and Environment,2023,2(1):5-11.
[2]Yuan S,Cassman K G,Huang J L,et al. Can ratoon cropping improve resource use efficiencies and profitability of rice in Central China?[J]. Field Crops Research,2019,234:66-72.
[3]Zhou Y J,Ji Y L,Zhang M,et al. Exploring a sustainable ricecropping system to balance grain yield,environmental footprint and economic benefits in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2023,404:136988.
[4]杨德生,黄见良,彭少兵.机收再生稻高产优质栽培技术研究进展[J].中国稻米,2023,29(5):1-8.
[5]农业农村部.农业农村部部署再生稻发展工作[R/OL].(2025-02-21)[2025-03-03]. https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202502/content_7004720.htm.
[6]王明磊,周文,王超,等.再生稻收获机作业效果综合评价分析[J].中国农机化学报,2023,44(11):9-13.
[7]林文雄,翁佩莹,林文芳,等.中国机收再生稻研究现状与展望[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(3):827-836.
[8]肖森.再生稻头季机收对再生季产量和品质的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2018.
[9]Zheng C,Wang Y C,Yuan S,et al. Heavy soil drying during mid-to-late grain filling stage of the main crop to reduce yield loss of the ratoon crop in a mechanized rice ratooning system[J]. The Crop Journal,2022,10(1):280-285.
[10]唐启源,青先国.湖南再生稻技术进步与生产发展对策[J].杂交水稻,2023,38(1):1-9.
[11]Lin W X. Developmental status and problems of rice ratooning[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2019,18(1):246-247.
[12]凌启鸿,苏祖芳,侯康平,等.水稻潜伏芽生长和穗分化形成规律及其应用的研究[J].中国农业科学,1989,22(1):35-43.
[13]林强,蔡秋华,崔丽丽,等.强再生力水稻品种筛选与选育研究进展[J].中国稻米,2022,28(5):1-6.
[14]张兴芳,张立平,董伟,等.适宜北纬32°地区“一种两收”栽培模式的中稻品种筛选试验[J].现代农业科技,2024(11):32-38.
[15]邵彩虹,熊丽,伍先群,等.头季留桩高度对‘甬优4949’水稻腋芽萌发及再生季产量形成的影响[J].西北农业学报,2024,33(12):2253-2260.
[16]付建伟,张国忠,谢干,等.双通道喂入式再生稻收获机研制[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(3):11-20.
[17]易镇邪,周文新,屠乃美.留桩高度对再生稻源库性状与物质运转的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2009,23(5):509-516.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.20250421.079
中图分类号:S511
引用信息:
[1]孙鑫,盖盼盼,陈宏景,等.不同机收方式对再生稻产量与品质的影响[J].杂交水稻,2026,41(02):60-68.DOI:10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.20250421.079.
基金信息:
“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2301003)
2025-12-29
2025-12-29
2025-12-29